Food and Bioproducts Processing

2.3k papers and 61.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing in the last decades have received a total of 61.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing usually cover Food Science (1.0k papers), Biomedical Engineering (505 papers) and Molecular Biology (457 papers) specifically the topics of Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (345 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (310 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food and Bioproducts Processing are Charis M. Galanakis, Ashim K. Datta, İ̇brahim Doymaz, Rosalam Sarbatly, T.R.A. Magee, Rajesh Nithyanandam, Duduku Krishnaiah, Raquel P. F. Guiné, W.A.M. McMinn and Xiao Dong Chen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing.

Countries where authors publish in Food and Bioproducts Processing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food and Bioproducts Processing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food and Bioproducts Processing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food and Bioproducts Processing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025