Mark Schlager

25 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Mark Schlager
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 275
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 46
  • Computer Science Applications 88
  • Communication 113
  • Education 410
Replace Richard A. Schwier with:
Richard A. Schwier Canada
Harvey Mellar United Kingdom
Patrick Griffin Australia
Bernhard Ertl Germany
Jan van Bruggen Netherlands
Robert‐Jan Simons Netherlands
Peter E. Doolittle United States
Rod Sims Australia
Alexander J. Romiszowski United States
Andrew Ravenscroft United Kingdom
Mark Schlager relative to Richard A. Schwier Canada Richard A. Schwier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Richard A. Schwier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schlager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schlager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schlager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schlager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schlager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schlager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schlager. The network helps show where Mark Schlager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schlager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schlager Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schlager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003281
2 199068
3 200763
4 200860
5 199742
6 202141
7 199835
8
Characterizing Adaptive Expertise in Science Teaching
200533
9 196929
10 202128
11
Assessing the Impact of a Large-Scale Online Teacher Professional Development Community
200018
12 201318
13 200914
14 199912
15 199911
16 201010
17 20069
18 19868
19 19908
20
Representing a Student's Learning States and Transitions
19956

About Mark Schlager

Mark Schlager is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 26 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers) and Simulation and Modeling Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (275 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (46 citations), Computer Science Applications (88 citations), Communication (113 citations) and Education (410 citations). Mark Schlager has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judith Fusco, Patricia Schänk, Mark A. McDaniel, Umer Farooq, Juan P. Fusco, Nathan Dwyer, Margaret Riel, Yukie Toyama, Mark W. Schurgin and Lauren Wilcox. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Protection Dosimetry, The Information Society, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Journal of Teacher Education and Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact