Umer Farooq

1.3k citations
86 papers · 939 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Umer Farooq

74 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Umer Farooq
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Human-Computer Interaction 130
  • Communication 115
  • Computer Science Applications 75
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 114
Replace Lynn Johnson with:
Lynn Johnson United States
Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo Spain
SM Bridges Hong Kong
Estelle Michinov France
Diane J. Skiba United States
Lex van Velsen Netherlands
Steven Ariss United Kingdom
Reeva Lederman Australia
Jina Huh United States
Nazlena Mohamad Ali Malaysia
Umer Farooq relative to Lynn Johnson United States Lynn Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Lynn Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Umer Farooq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Umer Farooq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umer Farooq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umer Farooq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Umer Farooq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umer Farooq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umer Farooq. The network helps show where Umer Farooq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Umer Farooq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Umer Farooq Line = papers co-authored together Umer Farooq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200879
2 200777
3 200959
4 200557
5 201954
6 200542
7 201341
8 201139
9 201727
10 202126
11
Facebook Addiction: A Study of Big-Five Factors and Academic Performance amongst Students of IUB
201423
12 200722
13 202321
14 201620
15 201220
16 200719
17 202317
18 201717
19 201015
20 201514

About Umer Farooq

Umer Farooq is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Information Systems and Management and Epidemiology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (12 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (10 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (130 citations), Communication (115 citations), Computer Science Applications (75 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (114 citations). Umer Farooq has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include John M. Carroll, Mark Schlager, Patricia Schänk, Judith Fusco, Craig H. Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson, Lu Xiao, Gregorio Convertino, Nathan Dwyer and Mary Beth Rosson. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Stress, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, American Journal of Therapeutics, Postgraduate Medical Journal and Frontiers in Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact