Umer Farooq

1.3k citations
81 papers · 809 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Umer Farooq

69 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers

Umer Farooq
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Human-Computer Interaction 111
  • Communication 91
  • Computer Science Applications 53
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Orthodontics 33
Replace Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo with:
Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo Spain
Kathleen H. Pine United States
Lynn Johnson United States
Estelle Michinov France
Diane J. Skiba United States
Steven Ariss United Kingdom
Katie A. Siek United States
Inocencio Maramba United Kingdom
Samy A. Azer Saudi Arabia
Ann Fruhling United States
Umer Farooq relative to Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo Spain Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Umer Farooq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Umer Farooq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umer Farooq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umer Farooq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Umer Farooq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umer Farooq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umer Farooq. The network helps show where Umer Farooq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Umer Farooq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Umer Farooq Line = papers co-authored together Umer Farooq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200763
2 200860
3 201952
4 200952
5 200545
6 201339
7 201134
8 200531
9 202126
10 201725
11
Facebook Addiction: A Study of Big-Five Factors and Academic Performance amongst Students of IUB
201422
12 202321
13 201619
14 201218
15 202317
16 201717
17 200716
18 201015
19 201514
20 200714

About Umer Farooq

Umer Farooq is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Epidemiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and General Health Professions, having authored 81 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (6 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (4 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (111 citations), Communication (91 citations), Computer Science Applications (53 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations) and Orthodontics (33 citations). Umer Farooq has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include John M. Carroll, Mark Schlager, Patricia Schänk, Judith Fusco, Craig H. Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson, Lu Xiao, Jonathan Grudin, Mary Beth Rosson and Gregorio Convertino. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Quality of Life Research, American Journal of Therapeutics, Journal of Teacher Education and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact