John Thomas

5.7k citations
149 papers · 4.3k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

John Thomas

131 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

John Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Human-Computer Interaction 678
  • Computer Science Applications 224
  • Information Systems and Management 266
  • Communication 241
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 184
Replace Max Mühlhäuser with:
Max Mühlhäuser Germany
David Randall Germany
Paul Cairns United Kingdom
Juergen Sauer Switzerland
Gareth J. F. Jones Ireland
Neil Gershenfeld United States
D. A. Thomas United States
John T. Richards United States
Pedro Antunes Portugal
Joseph Kaye United States
John Thomas relative to Max Mühlhäuser Germany Max Mühlhäuser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Max Mühlhäuser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Thomas. The network helps show where John Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Thomas Line = papers co-authored together John Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982242
2 2008241
3 2001232
4 2002179
5 2009158
6 2013150
7 1979149
8 1988126
9 1975124
10 2018120
11 1980120
12 2014120
13 1980106
14 200481
15 200777
16 199876
17 199676
18 198472
19 199567
20 198967

About John Thomas

John Thomas is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Materials Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 149 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (25 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (14 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Software Engineering and Design Patterns (6 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (678 citations), Computer Science Applications (224 citations), Information Systems and Management (266 citations), Communication (241 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (184 citations). John Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include John M. Carroll, Anton Van der Ven, Wendy A. Kellogg, Qingchuan Xu, Ashok Malhotra, Lance A. Miller, Anirudh Raju Natarajan, John D. Gould, B. Swoboda and Brian Puchala. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Physical Review Materials, IBM Systems Journal and Film Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact