Mark Prescott

1.6k citations
62 papers · 1.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • Biochemical and Structural Characterization 5
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 10
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 7

Mark Prescott

62 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Prescott
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Physiology 123
  • Parasitology 145
  • Small Animals 131
  • Aging 16
  • Insect Science 98
Replace Bruno Maresca with:
Bruno Maresca Italy
Robert M. Greenberg United States
W Stoffel Germany
Eric Depiereux Belgium
Ifor R. Beacham Australia
Philippe Vincendeau France
R. Elwyn Isaac United Kingdom
Loyd D. Rowe United States
A. Castro Portugal
J.A. Cebrián-Pérez Spain
Mark Prescott relative to Bruno Maresca Italy Bruno Maresca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Bruno Maresca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Prescott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Prescott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Prescott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Prescott. The network helps show where Mark Prescott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Prescott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Prescott Line = papers co-authored together Mark Prescott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200873
2 201264
3 201048
4 198945
5 200045
6 200042
7 201042
8 198741
9 201839
10 198836
11 198436
12 199534
13 198933
14 201232
15 199332
16 201030
17 201130
18 199628
19 202027
20 198927

About Mark Prescott

Mark Prescott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Small Animals and Parasitology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (5 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (5 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (123 citations), Parasitology (145 citations), Small Animals (131 citations), Aging (16 citations) and Insect Science (98 citations). Mark Prescott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander G. McLennan, Huw H. Rees, L. John Goad, Richard P. Evershed, Roy M. Daniel, Deborah Ward, Peter M. Brophy, E. James LaCourse, Geoffrey Wainwright and Samïrah Perally. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Nucleic Acids Research and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact