Journal of Mass Spectrometry

4.3k papers and 112.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 112.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry usually cover Spectroscopy (2.8k papers), Molecular Biology (1.5k papers) and Analytical Chemistry (602 papers) specifically the topics of Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2.4k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1.3k papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (541 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mass Spectrometry are R. Graham Cooks, Richard M. Caprioli, Károly Vékey, Magda Claeys, Filip Cuyckens, Richard B. Cole, Raymond E. March, John R. Yates, P. Kebarle and Simon J. Gaskell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mass Spectrometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025