Journal of Mass Spectrometry

173.1k citations
6.8k papers · · active since 1970

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 0.5%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Papers in

    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4.8k
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 360
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 324
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 560

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

6.7k papers receiving 161.5k citations

Peers

Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Spectroscopy 84.6k
  • Toxicology 9.8k
  • Analytical Chemistry 14.2k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 2.5k
  • Pharmacology 4.8k
Replace Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry with:
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry United States
Electrophoresis United States
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry United States
Journal of Chromatographic Science United States
Helvetica Chimica Acta Switzerland
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Germany
Tetrahedron United States
The Analyst China
Journal of Chromatography B China
Canadian Journal of Chemistry Canada
Journal of Mass Spectrometry relative to Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry United States Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mass Spectrometry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

About Journal of Mass Spectrometry

The 6.8k papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 173.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry usually cover Spectroscopy (5.1k papers), Toxicology (575 papers), Analytical Chemistry (602 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (122 papers) and Pharmacology (237 papers) specifically the topics of Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4.8k papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (560 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (433 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (375 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (360 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (324 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (212 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (210 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mass Spectrometry are David John Harvey, KLAUS BIEMANN, R. Graham Cooks, Richard M. Caprioli, Magda Claeys, Károly Vékey, Peter Roepstorff, Simon J. Gaskell, Filip Cuyckens and Raymond Evans March.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact