Journal of Mass Spectrometry

167.4k citations
6.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 0.5%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical chemistry methods development

Papers in

    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 3.5k
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2.1k
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 562
    • Analytical chemistry methods development 663

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

6.5k papers receiving 157.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Spectroscopy 82.6k
  • Analytical Chemistry 20.5k
  • Toxicology 5.3k
  • Molecular Biology 59.3k
  • Biochemistry 4.8k
Replace Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry with:
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry United States
Electrophoresis United States
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry United States
Canadian Journal of Chemistry Canada
Journal of Separation Science China
Chromatographia China
Journal of Chromatographic Science United States
Helvetica Chimica Acta Switzerland
Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry Sweden
Biomedical Chromatography China
Journal of Mass Spectrometry relative to Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry United States Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mass Spectrometry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

About Journal of Mass Spectrometry

The 6.7k papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 167.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry usually cover Spectroscopy (4.2k papers), Analytical Chemistry (932 papers), Toxicology (174 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (268 papers) and Molecular Biology (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3.5k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2.1k papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (794 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (663 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (562 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (489 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (363 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (282 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mass Spectrometry are David J. Harvey, K. Biemann, R. Graham Cooks, Richard M. Caprioli, Magda Claeys, Károly Vékey, Peter Roepstorff, Simon J. Gaskell, Filip Cuyckens and Raymond E. March.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact