Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

305.4k citations
11.9k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 0.5%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical chemistry methods development

Papers in

    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 5.3k
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2.8k
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 921
    • Analytical chemistry methods development 1.0k

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

10.5k papers receiving 274.9k citations

Peers

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Spectroscopy 129.3k
  • Analytical Chemistry 35.3k
  • Toxicology 5.3k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 9.1k
  • Molecular Biology 92.6k
Replace Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry with:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Germany
The Analyst China
Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy China
Langmuir United States
Talanta China
Analytica Chimica Acta China
Analytical Biochemistry United States
Microchemical Journal China
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry China
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science China
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry relative to Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Germany Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry.

About Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

The 11.9k papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 305.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry usually cover Spectroscopy (6.0k papers), Analytical Chemistry (1.4k papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (332 papers), Toxicology (174 papers) and Ecology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5.3k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2.8k papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (1.1k papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (1.0k papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1.0k papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (921 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (775 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (499 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry are Tyler B. Coplen, Boris Peter Koch, Thorsten Dittmar, Willi A. Brand, David John Harvey, David Cecil Smith, Patrik Španěl, Roland Anton Werner, Ronald C. Beavis and R. Graham Cooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact