Mark Cosgrove
Impact in
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Education top 2%
- Science Education and Pedagogy
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Innovative Teaching Methods
Papers in
-
- Science Education and Pedagogy 5
- Education and Technology Integration 3
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 3
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 2
- Co-authors
- Roger Osborne (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Science Education (4 papers)Research in Science Education (3 papers)International Journal of Technology and Design Education (2 papers)Journal of Research in Science Teaching (1 paper)Journal of the Learning Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandRussia
In The Last Decade
Mark Cosgrove
12 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 256
- Education 440
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 20
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 65
- Computer Science Applications 27
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cosgrove
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cosgrove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cosgrove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cosgrove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cosgrove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cosgrove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cosgrove. The network helps show where Mark Cosgrove may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Mark Cosgrove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 313 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 8 | Physical Change. Learning in Science Project. Working Paper No. 26. | 1981 | 10 |
| 9 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 4 |
About Mark Cosgrove
Mark Cosgrove is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications and Automotive Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (2 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper) and Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (256 citations), Education (440 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (20 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (65 citations) and Computer Science Applications (27 citations). Mark Cosgrove has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Roger Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Research in Science Education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.