Mark C. Carnes

1.3k citations
37 papers · 575 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark C. Carnes

28 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Mark C. Carnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • History 148
  • Literature and Literary Theory 85
  • Marketing 70
  • Gender Studies 71
Replace Martin Duberman with:
Martin Duberman United States
Steven Mintz United States
Clyde Griffen United States
E. Anthony Rotundo United States
Martin Jay
B. McH.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Karen Halttunen United States
Doris Sommer United States
Alison Landsberg United States
Mark C. Carnes relative to Martin Duberman United States Martin Duberman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Martin Duberman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Carnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Carnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Carnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Carnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Carnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Carnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Carnes. The network helps show where Mark C. Carnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Carnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Carnes Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Carnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Meanings for manhood : constructions of masculinity in Victorian America
1990124
2 199175
3 199562
4 199459
5 199155
6 201434
7 199026
8 199620
9 200214
10
The American Nation: A History of the United States
200713
11 199711
12 199210
13 19958
14 19937
15 20207
16 19917
17 20056
18 19905
19 20204
20 20074

About Mark C. Carnes

Mark C. Carnes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Marketing and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 37 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Migration, Identity, and Health (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper), Race, History, and American Society (1 paper) and Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), History (148 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (85 citations), Marketing (70 citations) and Gender Studies (71 citations). Mark C. Carnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Clyde Griffen, Louis P. Masur, George Chauncey, Thomas R. Cole, John A. Garraty, George L. Mosse, Jeffrey Meyers, David Leverenz, Robert A. Rosenstone and Christine DiStefano. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Reviews in American History and The New England Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact