B. McH.

1.3k citations
37 papers · 723 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis
    • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Music top 2%

Papers in

    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 3
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis 2
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 1

B. McH.

27 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

B. McH.
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Literature and Literary Theory 351
  • Music 51
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 78
  • Classics 43
  • History 97
Replace Naomi Schor with:
Naomi Schor United States
Catherine Belsey United Kingdom
Jack Stillinger United States
Leo Braudy United States
Henry Sussman United States
John Bender United States
Peter Uwe Hohendahl United States
Alastair Fowler United Kingdom
Dudley Andrew United States
Vytautas Kavolis United States
B. McH. relative to Naomi Schor United States Naomi Schor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Naomi Schor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. McH.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. McH.'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. McH. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. McH. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. McH.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. McH.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. McH.. The network helps show where B. McH. may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. McH., linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. McH. Line = papers co-authored together B. McH. links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988175
2 1987118
3 198789
4 198870
5 198856
6 198855
7 198741
8 198614
9 198711
10 198910
11 198610
12 19878
13 19908
14 19897
15 19886
16 19876
17 19906
18 19866
19 19914
20 19883

About B. McH.

B. McH. is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Music, History and Philosophy of Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 37 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (351 citations), Music (51 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (78 citations), Classics (43 citations) and History (97 citations). Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Parker, Andreas Huyssen, Teresa de Lauretis, Geoffrey H. Hartman, David Quint, John Frow, Barbara Foley, Edward M. Bruner, Stephen A. Tyler and Victor W. Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact