The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

102.1k citations
4.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Anthropology top 0.5%
    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • History top 0.2%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

2.5k papers receiving 39.1k citations

Peers

The Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Anthropology 14.6k
  • History 14.8k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4.3k
  • Classics 3.3k
  • Sociology and Political Science 36.6k
Replace The Economic History Review with:
The Economic History Review United Kingdom
Journal of the American Oriental Society United States
The William and Mary Quarterly United States
Technology and Culture United States
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion United States
Hispanic American Historical Review United States
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism United States
Geographical Journal United Kingdom
Journal of American History United States
British Journal of Sociology United Kingdom
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History relative to The Economic History Review United Kingdom The Economic History Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Economic History Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Interdisciplinary History more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

About The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

The 4.0k papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History in the last decades have received a total of 102.1k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History usually cover History (703 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (250 papers), Anthropology (446 papers), Political Science and International Relations (745 papers) and Classics (94 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (534 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (251 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (202 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (195 papers), Race, History, and American Society (179 papers), American History and Culture (161 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (131 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History are Sander L. Gilman, Brian Massumi, Félix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze, Susan D. Amussen, Thomas Laqueur, Steven Shapin, Immanuel Wallerstein, Simon Schaffer and James G. Traynham.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact