The New England Quarterly

3.2k papers and 21.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in The New England Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The New England Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (860 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (456 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (422 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (814 papers), American History and Culture (308 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The New England Quarterly are David Tyack, Alfred D. Chandler, AnnaLee Saxenian, Ann Douglas, Beverly R. Voloshin, Earl N. Harbert, Daniel Yergin, David R. Goldfield, Kenneth T. Jackson and David D. Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The New England Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The New England Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The New England Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The New England Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The New England Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The New England Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The New England Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025