Kenneth Clatterbaugh
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 4
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 4
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 1
- Co-authors
- Mark C. Carnes (1 shared paper)Mark E. Kann (1 shared paper)Michael S. Kimmel (1 shared paper)Ted Ownby (1 shared paper)Robert J. Moore (1 shared paper)K. Thompson (1 shared paper)Christine DiStefano (1 shared paper)David D. Gilmore (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)Men and Masculinities (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Clatterbaugh
14 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- History and Philosophy of Science 168
- Gender Studies 130
- Philosophy 159
- Anthropology 38
- History 40
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Clatterbaugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Clatterbaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Clatterbaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Clatterbaugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Clatterbaugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Clatterbaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Clatterbaugh. The network helps show where Kenneth Clatterbaugh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Clatterbaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 106 | |
| 2 | Contemporary Perspectives On Masculinity: Men, Women, And Politics In Modern Society, Second Edition | 1996 | 82 |
| 3 | 1998 | 48 | |
| 4 | Leibniz's doctrine of individual accidents | 1973 | 40 |
| 5 | 1980 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1965 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 0 |
About Kenneth Clatterbaugh
Kenneth Clatterbaugh is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (168 citations), Gender Studies (130 citations), Philosophy (159 citations), Anthropology (38 citations) and History (40 citations). Kenneth Clatterbaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark C. Carnes, Mark E. Kann, Michael S. Kimmel, Ted Ownby, Robert J. Moore, K. Thompson, Christine DiStefano, David D. Gilmore, Sam Keen and Victor Jeleniewski Seidler. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Philosophical Studies, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Philosophical Review and Men and Masculinities.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.