Mark C. Austin

2.8k citations
46 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Mark C. Austin

45 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Mark C. Austin
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biological Psychiatry 503
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 293
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 113
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 297
Replace Ginny Dilley with:
Ginny Dilley United States
George Jurjus United States
Malika El Yacoubi France
Michael Harte United Kingdom
Maria Lindskog Sweden
Rose Z. Terwilliger United States
Daniela Tardito Italy
Bhavya Voleti United States
Tsung‐Ung W. Woo United States
Houman Homayoun Iran
Mark C. Austin relative to Ginny Dilley United States Ginny Dilley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ginny Dilley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Austin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Austin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Austin. The network helps show where Mark C. Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Austin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Austin Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Austin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011330
2 2001178
3 2010170
4 1989165
5 2012119
6 201285
7 200875
8 199272
9 199470
10 202268
11 201168
12 200662
13 200058
14 198853
15 200950
16 199149
17 199048
18 200945
19 201242
20 198941

About Mark C. Austin

Mark C. Austin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Biological Psychiatry, Pharmacology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (19 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (503 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (293 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (113 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (297 citations). Mark C. Austin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Craig A. Stockmeier, Abiye H. Iyo, Agata Chandran, Beata Karolewicz, Dharmendra B. Goswami, Peter W. Kalivas, David A. Lewis, Grażyna Rajkowska, Allan R. Sampson and Joseph N. Pierri. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Neurochemistry, Biological Psychiatry, Brain Research and The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact