Mark Brooke
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Second Language Learning and Teaching
Papers in
-
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 7
-
- Second Language Learning and Teaching 8
- Co-authors
- Sik Hung Ng (3 shared papers)Stewart Pisecco (2 shared papers)David B. Baker (2 shared papers)Michael W. Dunne (1 shared paper)J. Paul Fawcett (4 shared papers)Phil A. Silva (1 shared paper)Selina Khoo (4 shared papers)John Shaw (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sustainability (2 papers)Teaching in Higher Education (2 papers)Journal of Language and Social Psychology (2 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)Communication & Sport (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeNew ZealandHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Mark Brooke
45 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Language and Linguistics 65
- Literature and Literary Theory 60
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 54
- Gender Studies 37
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Brooke
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Brooke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Brooke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Brooke. The network helps show where Mark Brooke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark Brooke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 41 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 5 |
About Mark Brooke
Mark Brooke is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Education and Safety Research, having authored 49 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (8 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (8 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (7 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (65 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (60 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (56 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (54 citations) and Gender Studies (37 citations). Mark Brooke has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, New Zealand and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Sik Hung Ng, Stewart Pisecco, David B. Baker, Michael W. Dunne, J. Paul Fawcett, Phil A. Silva, Phil A. Silva, Selina Khoo, John Shaw and Myles Cockburn. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Teaching in Higher Education, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, BMJ Open and Communication & Sport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.