Daniel Herron

950 citations
38 papers · 756 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Herron

36 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers

Daniel Herron
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 290
  • Human-Computer Interaction 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 89
  • Pharmacy 21
Replace Ling‐Yi Lin with:
Ling‐Yi Lin Taiwan
Unai Díaz-Orueta Ireland
Jay A. Olson Canada
Vanja Ković Serbia
Diego Edgar Shalom Argentina
Geoffrey B. Duggan United Kingdom
Kaya de Barbaro United States
Drew H. Abney United States
Arshya B. N. Vahabzadeh United States
Monika Lohani United States
Daniel Herron relative to Ling‐Yi Lin Taiwan Ling‐Yi Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Ling‐Yi Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Herron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Herron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Herron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Herron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Herron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Herron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Herron. The network helps show where Daniel Herron may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Herron, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Herron Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Herron links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004389
2 200041
3 201640
4 201726
5 201923
6 200121
7 201619
8 202018
9 201617
10 201516
11 201315
12 200012
13
Phonetic Rules for Diagnosis of Pronunciation Errors
200011
14 201411
15 202110
16 20139
17 20219
18 20156
19 20186
20 20216

About Daniel Herron

Daniel Herron is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Pharmacy, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Nursing care and research (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (290 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (87 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (89 citations) and Pharmacy (21 citations). Daniel Herron has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Moncur, Helena M Priest, Elise van den Hoven, Wolfgang Menzel, Lorna J. Gibson, Rachel D. Morton, Sue Read, Eric Atwell, Oliver L. Haimson and Rachel Menzies. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, International Journal of Inclusive Education, Patient Education and Counseling, Lara D. Veeken and International Emergency Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact