Tim Grant

1.4k citations
34 papers · 695 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Grant

33 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Tim Grant
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Clinical Psychology 206
  • Gender Studies 80
  • Sociology and Political Science 295
  • Social Psychology 137
  • Artificial Intelligence 176
Replace J. Pete Blair with:
J. Pete Blair United States
Bruce Austin United States
Μαρία Ιωάννου United Kingdom
Loene M. Howes Australia
Su‐Yen Chen Taiwan
Neal Feigenson United States
Richard Cullen Canada
Luke McNamara Australia
Joshua A. McGrane Australia
Frances Rock United Kingdom
Tim Grant relative to J. Pete Blair United States J. Pete Blair's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
J. Pete Blair · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Grant. The network helps show where Tim Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Grant Line = papers co-authored together Tim Grant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007156
2 2010101
3 201370
4 200751
5 201731
6 200731
7
TXT 4N6:method, consistency, and distinctiveness in the analysis of sms text messages
201328
8 200727
9 201623
10 201520
11 202220
12 201318
13 201318
14 200617
15 202016
16 200215
17 20059
18 20177
19 20206
20 20125

About Tim Grant

Tim Grant is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Authorship Attribution and Profiling (9 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers), Digital Communication and Language (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Gender Studies (80 citations), Sociology and Political Science (295 citations), Social Psychology (137 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (176 citations). Tim Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine Sheridan, Jessica Woodhams, Gavin Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, Claire L. Donohoe, John V. Reynolds, Cian Muldoon, Sinéad King, Naoimh J. O’Farrell and Andrew Price. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Crime and Law, Corpora, Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, Sexual Abuse and Breast Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact