John Shaw

1.9k citations
69 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

John Shaw

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 206
  • Pharmaceutical Science 277
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 40
  • Family Practice 31
  • Biomaterials 173
Replace Trudi Aspden with:
Trudi Aspden New Zealand
Troy Trygstad United States
Nilesh Patel United Kingdom
Shahid Shah Pakistan
José‐Esteban Peris Spain
Jean‐Paul Remon Belgium
Sı́lvia Storpirtis Brazil
Rongsheng Zhao China
Eman Abu‐Gharbieh United Arab Emirates
Bruce Sunderland Australia
John Shaw relative to Trudi Aspden New Zealand Trudi Aspden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Trudi Aspden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Shaw. The network helps show where John Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Shaw Line = papers co-authored together John Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010192
2 2017157
3 200299
4 201666
5 200350
6 201447
7 201547
8 201143
9 201441
10 199740
11 201838
12 201633
13 201033
14 201031
15 199827
16 200226
17 200425
18 198924
19 201423
20 200022

About John Shaw

John Shaw is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmaceutical Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (6 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (206 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (277 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (40 citations), Family Practice (31 citations) and Biomaterials (173 citations). John Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Raida Al‐Kassas, Ali Seyfoddin, Mahima Bansal, J. Dunlop, Lynne Emmerton, Zimei Wu, Jianping Liu, Wenli Zhang, Nadir Kheir and Bruce C. Baguley. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacy Education, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, BMC Palliative Care, Journal of Controlled Release and Pharmaceutical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact