Mark Boocock

1.4k citations
60 papers · 960 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Boocock

58 papers receiving 917 citations

Peers

Mark Boocock
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 43
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 219
  • Pharmacology 360
  • Occupational Therapy 50
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 45
Replace Daniel Cury Ribeiro with:
Daniel Cury Ribeiro New Zealand
Tatiana de Oliveira Sato Brazil
Andrew Merryweather United States
Donald S. Bloswick United States
Lloyd L. Laubach United States
Benjamin Steinhilber Germany
Morten Essendrop Norway
Wayne J. Albert Canada
Eva Holmström Sweden
M H Frings-Dresen Netherlands
Mark Boocock relative to Daniel Cury Ribeiro New Zealand Daniel Cury Ribeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Cury Ribeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Boocock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Boocock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Boocock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Boocock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Boocock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Boocock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Boocock. The network helps show where Mark Boocock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Boocock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Boocock Line = papers co-authored together Mark Boocock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201385
2 200667
3 200958
4 199454
5 201550
6 200847
7 199036
8 202133
9 201932
10 201432
11 200931
12 199029
13 201725
14 200624
15 198821
16 200221
17 199419
18 201618
19 200718
20 200617

About Mark Boocock

Mark Boocock is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Occupational Therapy and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (13 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (6 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (4 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (4 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (3 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (43 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (219 citations), Pharmacology (360 citations), Occupational Therapy (50 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (45 citations). Mark Boocock has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. McNair, Grant Mawston, Fiona Trevelyan, T. Reilly, J.D.G. Troup, Peter Larmer, S. Mark Taylor, K. Malcolm Tillotson, Kim Burton and Bridget Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Gait & Posture, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Clinical Biomechanics and Clinical Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact