Countries where authors publish in Clinical Rehabilitation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Rehabilitation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation.
About Clinical Rehabilitation
The 3.5k papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 128.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation usually cover Rehabilitation (642 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (224 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (297 papers), Occupational Therapy (68 papers) and Neurology (191 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (620 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (205 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (203 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (164 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (117 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (112 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (88 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Rehabilitation are Derick T Wade, Lynne Turner‐Stokes, Sarah Tyson, NB Lincoln, Richard W. Bohannon, Anand Pandyan, Peter W. Halligan, María Stokes, Louise Connell and G. Rankin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.