Benjamin Steinhilber

57 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

Benjamin Steinhilber
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 90
  • Rehabilitation 216
  • Pharmacology 384
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 49
  • Biomedical Engineering 413
Replace Mark Boocock with:
Mark Boocock New Zealand
Emiel van Trijffel Netherlands
Bryan Kirking United States
K Schüldt Sweden
Karen L. Newcomer United States
Hamid Behtash Iran
Deborah Alperovitch‐Najenson Israel
Magnus McLaren United Kingdom
Susan Warming Denmark
Sheryl S. Ulin United States
Benjamin Steinhilber relative to Mark Boocock New Zealand Mark Boocock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Mark Boocock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Steinhilber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Steinhilber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Steinhilber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Steinhilber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Steinhilber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Steinhilber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Steinhilber. The network helps show where Benjamin Steinhilber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Steinhilber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Steinhilber Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Steinhilber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202191
2 201965
3 201958
4 202152
5 202145
6 201940
7 201434
8 201931
9 202027
10 201425
11 201624
12 201124
13 202023
14 201622
15 201620
16 201118
17 202018
18 201517
19 201416
20 202215

About Benjamin Steinhilber

Benjamin Steinhilber is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology and Rheumatology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (11 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (11 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (10 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (9 papers), Occupational health in dentistry (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (90 citations), Rehabilitation (216 citations), Pharmacology (384 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (49 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (413 citations). Benjamin Steinhilber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Monika A. Rieger, Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Inga Krauß, Pia Janßen, Regina Miller, Christopher G. Maher, Peter Martus, Thomas Läubli and Ralf Rothmund. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Applied Ergonomics, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Surgical Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact