Benjamin Steinhilber

58 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

Benjamin Steinhilber
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 57
  • Rehabilitation 192
  • Pharmacology 268
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 43
  • Biomedical Engineering 381
Replace Daniel Cury Ribeiro with:
Daniel Cury Ribeiro New Zealand
Raffaele Mugnai Italy
Mark Boocock New Zealand
Bryan Kirking United States
Raquel Aparecida Casarotto Brazil
Gregory G. Knapik United States
K Schüldt Sweden
Emiel van Trijffel Netherlands
Kristín Briem Iceland
Catherine Ha France
Benjamin Steinhilber relative to Daniel Cury Ribeiro New Zealand Daniel Cury Ribeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Daniel Cury Ribeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Steinhilber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Steinhilber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Steinhilber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Steinhilber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Steinhilber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Steinhilber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Steinhilber. The network helps show where Benjamin Steinhilber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Steinhilber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Steinhilber Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Steinhilber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021100
2 201969
3 202161
4 201960
5 202151
6 201942
7 201434
8 201931
9 202029
10 201427
11 202025
12 201624
13 201124
14 201623
15 201621
16 201518
17 201118
18 202018
19 201416
20 202215

About Benjamin Steinhilber

Benjamin Steinhilber is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, having authored 64 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (23 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (11 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (11 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (10 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (8 papers), Occupational health in dentistry (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (57 citations), Rehabilitation (192 citations), Pharmacology (268 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (43 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (381 citations). Benjamin Steinhilber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Monika A. Rieger, Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Inga Krauß, Pia Janßen, Regina Miller, Christopher G. Maher, Peter Martus, Thomas Läubli and Ralf Rothmund. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Applied Ergonomics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Surgical Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact