Keith Linge

942 citations
22 papers · 754 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Linge

22 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Keith Linge
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 289
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 305
  • Occupational Therapy 49
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 44
  • Biomedical Engineering 306
Replace Paul Tinley with:
Paul Tinley Australia
Craig Payne Australia
Gabriel Gijón-Noguerón Spain
Paul Butterworth Australia
David Tiberio United States
David J. Gutekunst United States
Andrew J. Meyr United States
Adam Bird Australia
Melinda M. Franettovich Smith Australia
P. Westblad Sweden
Keith Linge relative to Paul Tinley Australia Paul Tinley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Paul Tinley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Linge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Linge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Linge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Linge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Linge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Linge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Linge. The network helps show where Keith Linge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Keith Linge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Linge Line = papers co-authored together Keith Linge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991196
2 199682
3 198378
4 199368
5 199541
6 199839
7 198738
8 198937
9 199029
10 199422
11 198821
12 199720
13 199219
14 198317
15 198714
16 199111
17
A preliminary objective evaluation of leprosy footwear using in-shoe pressure measurement.
19968
18 20025
19 19944
20 19882

About Keith Linge

Keith Linge is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (12 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (9 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (6 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (289 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (305 citations), Occupational Therapy (49 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (44 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (306 citations). Keith Linge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include L. Klenerman, Janet Hughes, Meir Nyska, Lawrence E Pratt, P Clark, Christopher McCabe, G. Bentley, T. Reilly, J.D.G. Troup and Peter Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Clinical Biomechanics, Applied Ergonomics, Gait & Posture and Foot & Ankle International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact