Bridget Armstrong

89 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Bridget Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 26
  • Pharmacology 198
  • Pharmacy 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 273
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
Replace Erin Kaye Howie with:
Erin Kaye Howie United States
Ingrid J.M. Hendriksen Netherlands
Amanda Marie Hall Canada
Anette Harris Norway
Jan Seghers Belgium
Claudia Spahn Germany
RUSSELL R. PATE United States
Márcia R. Franco Brazil
Silje Endresen Rème Norway
Neiva Leite Brazil
Bridget Armstrong relative to Erin Kaye Howie United States Erin Kaye Howie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Erin Kaye Howie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Armstrong. The network helps show where Bridget Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bridget Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together Bridget Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008166
2 202199
3 200578
4 202172
5 200668
6 202166
7 202057
8 202153
9 200846
10 201144
11 201343
12 202039
13 202031
14 201730
15 202230
16 201928
17 201328
18 201627
19 202023
20 202423

About Bridget Armstrong

Bridget Armstrong is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (26 papers), Sleep and related disorders (16 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (26 citations), Pharmacology (198 citations), Pharmacy (47 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (273 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations). Bridget Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter John McNair, Michael W. Beets, Robert Glenn Weaver, Sarah A. Burkart, Denise M. Taylor, Lauren von Klinggraeff, David M. Janicke, Maureen M. Black, Alexis Jones and Hannah Parker. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Pediatric Obesity, Childhood Obesity, SLEEP and Journal of Pediatric Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact