Lorena Arranz

39 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Lorena Arranz
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biological Psychiatry 242
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 281
  • Hematology 532
  • Genetics 483
  • Aging 55
Replace Helena S. Ennes with:
Helena S. Ennes United States
Vera Chesnokova United States
Lucas K. Smith United States
Marcelo Páez-Pereda Germany
Jinte Middeldorp Netherlands
Antonietta Gentile Italy
Helton José Reis Brazil
Barry W. McColl United Kingdom
Yoshifumi Sonobe Japan
Isabelle St‐Amour Canada
Lorena Arranz relative to Helena S. Ennes United States Helena S. Ennes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Helena S. Ennes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorena Arranz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorena Arranz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorena Arranz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorena Arranz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorena Arranz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorena Arranz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorena Arranz. The network helps show where Lorena Arranz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorena Arranz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorena Arranz Line = papers co-authored together Lorena Arranz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014324
2 2018269
3 2014233
4 2013114
5 201491
6 200681
7 200780
8 200870
9 201768
10 201067
11 200762
12 200857
13 201856
14 201950
15 200748
16 201044
17 201037
18 201136
19 200933
20 202026

About Lorena Arranz

Lorena Arranz is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience, Hematology, Immunology and Genetics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (13 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (12 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (7 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (7 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (242 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (281 citations), Hematology (532 citations), Genetics (483 citations) and Aging (55 citations). Lorena Arranz has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mónica De la Fuente, Aurora Bernal, Simón Méndez‐Ferrer, Joan Isern, Daniel Martín-Pérez, Nuria M. De Castro, Isabel Baeza, María‐Paz Viveros, Abel Sánchez‐Aguilera and Noelia Guayerbas. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Biogerontology, eLife and Rejuvenation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact