Dena E. Cohen

33 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Dena E. Cohen
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 701
  • Aging 145
  • Biological Psychiatry 68
  • Physiology 599
  • Physiology 105
Replace Soner Doğan with:
Soner Doğan Türkiye
Edward Fielder United Kingdom
Karen I. Guerin United States
María Morán Spain
Foram N. Ashar United States
Bauke V. Schomakers Netherlands
Sigfrido Scarpa Italy
Cristina Aguayo‐Mazzucato United States
Sanish Sathyan United States
Dena E. Cohen relative to Soner Doğan Türkiye Soner Doğan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Soner Doğan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena E. Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena E. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena E. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena E. Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena E. Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena E. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena E. Cohen. The network helps show where Dena E. Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dena E. Cohen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena E. Cohen Line = papers co-authored together Dena E. Cohen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007618
2 2011320
3 1999236
4 2011219
5 2011211
6 200870
7 200767
8 201958
9 200849
10 200247
11 201236
12 201830
13 201219
14 201717
15 201316
16 202116
17 201115
18
Unemployment: choices for Europe. Monitoring European integration, 5
199514
19 201313
20 199713

About Dena E. Cohen

Dena E. Cohen is a scholar working on Nephrology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics, Physiology and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (6 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (701 citations), Aging (145 citations), Biological Psychiatry (68 citations), Physiology (599 citations) and Physiology (105 citations). Dena E. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Guarente, Douglas A. Melton, Laura Bordone, Andrew D. Steele, J. Edward van Veen, Stephen Marmor, Agnieszka K. Czopik, Maria Carla Motta, Ashley S. Robinson and Wei Gu. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Journal of Nephrology, Cell, BMC Nephrology and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact