Lilly Lin
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 2
-
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 2
- Co-authors
- James A. Kulik (2 shared papers)Jeffrey M. Stanton (2 shared papers)Patricia C. Smith (1 shared paper)Gail Ironson (1 shared paper)Christiane Spitzmüller (1 shared paper)Steven S. Russell (1 shared paper)Christiane Spitzmueller (1 shared paper)Scott Highhouse (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Basic and Applied Social Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Black Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (1 paper)Educational and Psychological Measurement (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lilly Lin
5 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
- Marketing 67
- Museology 21
- Pharmacy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Lilly Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Lilly Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lilly Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lilly Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lilly Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lilly Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lilly Lin. The network helps show where Lilly Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Lilly Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 91 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 9 |
About Lilly Lin
Lilly Lin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (181 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 citations), Marketing (67 citations), Museology (21 citations) and Pharmacy (23 citations). Lilly Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Kulik, Jeffrey M. Stanton, Patricia C. Smith, Gail Ironson, Christiane Spitzmüller, Steven S. Russell, Christiane Spitzmueller and Scott Highhouse. Their work appears in journals such as Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Black Psychology, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.