Journal of Black Psychology

1.0k papers and 24.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Journal of Black Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 24.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Black Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (455 papers), Clinical Psychology (347 papers) and Education (275 papers) specifically the topics of Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (303 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (160 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Black Psychology are Marley W. Watkins, Elizabeth A. Klonoff, Hope Landrine, Howard C. Stevenson, William E. Cross, Natasha K. Bowen, Bridget E. Weller, Robert M. Sellers, Anita Thomas and Danice L. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Black Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Black Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Black Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Black Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Black Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Black Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Black Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025