Ken Prusa

1.8k citations
59 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • Meat and Animal Product Quality 48
    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology 35
    • Pharmacological Effects and Assays 11
    • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 7
    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 4
    • Food Quality and Safety Studies 3

Ken Prusa

56 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ken Prusa
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.2k
  • Small Animals 201
  • Food Science 207
  • Genetics 297
  • Cell Biology 108
Replace T. D. Pringle with:
T. D. Pringle United States
Christian Touraille France
Marjeta Čandek‐Potokar Slovenia
Jeehwan Choe South Korea
D.R. McKenna United States
J. C. Forrest United States
Gunilla Lindahl Sweden
Hervé Rémignon France
D.N. D’Souza Australia
Martin Škrlep Slovenia
Ken Prusa relative to T. D. Pringle United States T. D. Pringle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
T. D. Pringle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Prusa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Prusa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Prusa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Prusa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Prusa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Prusa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Prusa. The network helps show where Ken Prusa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Prusa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Prusa Line = papers co-authored together Ken Prusa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002332
2 2001223
3 2007101
4 200880
5 201272
6 200767
7 201055
8 201731
9 198730
10 201028
11 199128
12 201126
13 199824
14 201724
15 201622
16 200722
17 198921
18 201821
19 200220
20 201518

About Ken Prusa

Ken Prusa is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (48 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (35 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (7 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.2k citations), Small Animals (201 citations), Food Science (207 citations), Genetics (297 citations) and Cell Biology (108 citations). Ken Prusa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include E. Huff‐Lonergan, Jack C. M. Dekkers, M. Malek, M. F. Rothschild, Tracey Baas, Steven M. Lonergan, C.A. Reitmeier, Massoud Malek, Max F. Rothschild and T. J. Baas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Meat Science, Journal of Food Science, Poultry Science and Journal of Food Protection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact