Thomas Weber

7.2k citations
86 papers · 4.5k · h-index 38

Impact in

  • Neurology top 1%
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Oncology top 2%
    • Polyomavirus and related diseases

Papers in

Thomas Weber

80 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Neurology 518
  • Oncology 1.1k
  • Neurology 498
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 590
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
Replace K. Felgenhauer with:
K. Felgenhauer Germany
Axel Pagenstecher Germany
Douglas A. Kerr United States
Leslie P. Weiner United States
Thomas Leist United States
Martina Deckert Germany
Werner Stenzel Germany
Carlo Tornatore United States
H. Link Sweden
David L. Nelson United States
Thomas Weber relative to K. Felgenhauer Germany K. Felgenhauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
K. Felgenhauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Weber. The network helps show where Thomas Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Weber Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998332
2 1995281
3 2006267
4 1997258
5 1994191
6 1996186
7 1996169
8 1996140
9 1998139
10 1995126
11 2000122
12 1997119
13 1999104
14 199691
15 199789
16 199788
17 199584
18 199883
19 200180
20 199479

About Thomas Weber

Thomas Weber is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 86 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polyomavirus and related diseases (24 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (16 papers), Full-Duplex Wireless Communications (11 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (9 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (9 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (6 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (518 citations), Oncology (1.1k citations), Neurology (498 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (590 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.6k citations). Thomas Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include S. Poser, Inga Zerr, Markus Otto, Hans A. Kretzschmar, Monika Bodemer, Hayrettin Tumani, Paola Cinque, W. Lüer, Jens Wiltfang and Wolfgang Lüke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of NeuroVirology, Annals of Neurology, Journal of Neurology, The Lancet and Journal of Neuroimmunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact