Keith C. Hooper

937 citations
43 papers · 639 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Keith C. Hooper

40 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Keith C. Hooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Accounting 247
  • Management Information Systems 200
  • Public Administration 51
  • Information Systems and Management 65
  • Strategy and Management 92
Replace Thomas N. Tyson with:
Thomas N. Tyson United States
Bill Jenkins United Kingdom
Isabelle Huault France
Mary C. Wilson United States
Jörg Bogumil Germany
Werner Sombart Germany
Karen Ho United States
Jordi Blanes i Vidal United Kingdom
Soma Pillay Australia
Peter Waring Australia
Keith C. Hooper relative to Thomas N. Tyson United States Thomas N. Tyson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas N. Tyson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith C. Hooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith C. Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith C. Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith C. Hooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith C. Hooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith C. Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith C. Hooper. The network helps show where Keith C. Hooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Keith C. Hooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith C. Hooper Line = papers co-authored together Keith C. Hooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006113
2 200566
3 200247
4 201247
5 199139
6 199533
7 200730
8 200430
9 199726
10 200722
11 201121
12 199621
13 201718
14 200317
15 199314
16 200913
17 20069
18 19938
19 19957
20
Can sector-specific standards enhance the comparability of Third sector organisations' financial statements?
20147

About Keith C. Hooper

Keith C. Hooper is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems, Finance, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (14 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (247 citations), Management Information Systems (200 citations), Public Administration (51 citations), Information Systems and Management (65 citations) and Strategy and Management (92 citations). Keith C. Hooper has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kate Kearins, Howard Davey, Mary Low, Michael J. Pratt, Stephen P. Keef, Karin Olesen, Hedy Jiaying Huang, Jenny Jing Wang, Deryl Northcott and Jenny Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting History, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Managerial Auditing Journal and Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact