Critical Perspectives on Accounting

1.6k papers and 47.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting in the last decades have received a total of 47.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting usually cover Management Information Systems (748 papers), Accounting (595 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (335 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting and Organizational Management (730 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (414 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (300 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Perspectives on Accounting are Lee D. Parker, Jesse Dillard, Christine Cooper, Judy Brown, Yves Gendron, Glen Lehman, Prem Sikka, Jan Bebbington, John Flower and Carol A. Adams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Perspectives on Accounting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025