Managerial Auditing Journal

45.4k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1986

Impact in

  • Accounting top 0.5%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Accounting and Financial Management
    • Corporate Governance and Financial Management
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
    • Quality and Management Systems

Papers in

    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 961
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 70
    • Accounting Education and Careers 66
    • Accounting and Organizational Management 144

Managerial Auditing Journal

1.5k papers receiving 39.7k citations

Peers

Managerial Auditing Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Accounting 28k
  • Strategy and Management 13.9k
  • Management Information Systems 4.9k
  • Information Systems and Management 2.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.2k
Replace The British Accounting Review with:
The British Accounting Review United Kingdom
European Accounting Review United Kingdom
Accounting and Business Research United Kingdom
Small Business Economics United States
Industrial and Corporate Change United States
The RAND Journal of Economics United States
Contemporary Accounting Research United States
Critical Perspectives on Accounting United Kingdom
Managerial and Decision Economics United States
Journal of Small Business Management United States
Managerial Auditing Journal relative to The British Accounting Review United Kingdom The British Accounting Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
The British Accounting Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Managerial Auditing Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Managerial Auditing Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal.

About Managerial Auditing Journal

The 1.6k papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal in the last decades have received a total of 45.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal usually cover Accounting (1.1k papers), Management Information Systems (235 papers), Strategy and Management (288 papers), Information Systems and Management (68 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (83 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (961 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (144 papers), Corporate Governance and Financial Management (99 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (71 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (70 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (66 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (58 papers) and Quality and Management Systems (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Managerial Auditing Journal are Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Abdifatah Ahmed Haji, Charalambos T. Spathis, Ataur Rahman Belal, Jiju Antony, Zabihollah Rezaee, Nava Subramaniam, Khaled Hussainey, Mike Adams and Mostafa Kamal Hassan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact