Managerial Auditing Journal

46.9k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Accounting top 0.5%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Risk Management in Financial Firms
    • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
    • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
    • Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Papers in

    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 882
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 495
    • Risk Management in Financial Firms 189
    • Accounting Education and Careers 82
    • Accounting and Organizational Management 303
    • Quality and Supply Management 70

Managerial Auditing Journal

1.4k papers receiving 39.1k citations

Peers

Managerial Auditing Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Accounting 29.7k
  • Strategy and Management 18.4k
  • Management Information Systems 8.8k
  • Information Systems and Management 3.4k
  • Marketing 3.8k
Replace The British Accounting Review with:
The British Accounting Review United Kingdom
European Accounting Review United Kingdom
Accounting and Business Research United Kingdom
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy United States
Accounting and Finance Australia
Industrial and Corporate Change United States
International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship United Kingdom
Critical Perspectives on Accounting United Kingdom
Corporate Governance United Kingdom
Managerial and Decision Economics United States
Managerial Auditing Journal relative to The British Accounting Review United Kingdom The British Accounting Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The British Accounting Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Managerial Auditing Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Managerial Auditing Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal.

About Managerial Auditing Journal

The 1.6k papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal in the last decades have received a total of 46.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal usually cover Accounting (1.0k papers), Management Information Systems (402 papers), Strategy and Management (405 papers), General Decision Sciences (26 papers) and Public Administration (50 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (882 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (495 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (303 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (189 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (160 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (95 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (82 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Managerial Auditing Journal are Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Abdifatah Ahmed Haji, Ataur Rahman Belal, Zabihollah Rezaee, Charalambos Spathis, Jiju Antony, Nava Subramaniam, Khaled Hussainey, Mike Adams and Mostafa Kamal Hassan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact