Igna Bonfrer

26 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Igna Bonfrer
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Finance 152
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 218
  • Family Practice 12
  • General Health Professions 155
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
Replace Jesse Abbott-Klafter with:
Jesse Abbott-Klafter United States
Hongzhao Zhang China
John C. Langenbrunner United States
Marleen Elisabeth Hendriks Netherlands
Bishal Gyawali Denmark
Le Cai China
Anderson Stanciole Switzerland
Karar Zunaid Ahsan United States
Dongfu Qian China
Igna Bonfrer relative to Jesse Abbott-Klafter United States Jesse Abbott-Klafter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Jesse Abbott-Klafter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Igna Bonfrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Igna Bonfrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igna Bonfrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igna Bonfrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Igna Bonfrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igna Bonfrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igna Bonfrer. The network helps show where Igna Bonfrer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Igna Bonfrer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Igna Bonfrer Line = papers co-authored together Igna Bonfrer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012334
2 201487
3 201477
4 201356
5 201656
6 201647
7 202225
8 202120
9 201816
10 201316
11 201814
12 202313
13 202211
14
Does health care utilization match needs in Africa? Challenging conventional needs measurement
201211
15 20228
16 20247
17 20244
18 20214
19 20234
20 20242

About Igna Bonfrer

Igna Bonfrer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (10 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (9 papers), Global Health Care Issues (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (152 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (218 citations), Family Practice (12 citations), General Health Professions (155 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations). Igna Bonfrer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Van de Poel, Eddy van Doorslaer, Emily Gustafsson‐Wright, Tobias F. Rinke de Wit, Amos Kahwa, Esegiel Gaeb, Constance Schultsz, Wendy Janssens, Lizzy M. Brewster and Tanimola M. Akande. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, PLoS ONE, Health Affairs, Frontiers in Public Health and The European Journal of Health Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact