Julia E. Smith

2.3k citations
32 papers · 906 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Julia E. Smith

31 papers receiving 898 citations

Peers

Julia E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 215
  • Gastroenterology 50
  • Sensory Systems 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 28
Replace J. G. Murray with:
J. G. Murray United Kingdom
Alice E. McGovern Australia
Fadi Xu United States
Jen Yu Wei United States
Marion U. Goebel Germany
Geber Peña United States
B. Greenwood United States
Korey D. Stevanovic United States
David Fried United States
Hilary Wilson United States
Julia E. Smith relative to J. G. Murray United Kingdom J. G. Murray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. G. Murray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia E. Smith. The network helps show where Julia E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Julia E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998198
2 2018101
3 199757
4 201854
5 201848
6 200136
7 200734
8 199933
9 202032
10 200728
11 200227
12 201127
13
Is the beneficial effect of sulfasalazine due to inhibition of synovial neovascularization?
199126
14 202024
15 200023
16 202020
17 202018
18 201118
19 202017
20 199816

About Julia E. Smith

Julia E. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology and Immunology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (6 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (215 citations), Gastroenterology (50 citations), Sensory Systems (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (28 citations). Julia E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Gilbey, Arthur D. Loewy, Arthur S.P Jansen, Paul Andrews, Julia Strand, Violet A. Brown, Andrew D. Cook, John A. Hamilton, Ming-Chin Lee and Adrian Achuthan. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Neuroscience, The Lancet Rheumatology, Neurogastroenterology & Motility and Autonomic Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact