Gastroenterology

263.8k papers and 5.8M indexed citations i.

About

263.8k papers covering Gastroenterology have received a total of 5.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments, Gastrointestinal motility and disorders and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment and also cover the fields of Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology. Some of the most active scholars covering Gastroenterology are Michael Camilleri, Douglas A. Drossman, Jan Tack, Nicholas J. Talley, Robert E. Spiller, Joel E. Richter, Eamonn M.M. Quigley, John F. Cryan, Emeran A. Mayer and John B. Furness.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Gastroenterology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Gastroenterology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Gastroenterology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Gastroenterology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Gastroenterology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Gastroenterology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gastroenterology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025