Jonathan Pila

1.7k citations
40 papers · 901 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Pila

39 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Jonathan Pila
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Geometry and Topology 720
  • Algebra and Number Theory 238
  • Mathematical Physics 412
  • Theoretical Computer Science 43
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 107
Replace Marc Hindry with:
Marc Hindry France
Robert S. Rumely United States
Attila Pethő Hungary
Gisbert Wüstholz Switzerland
Pietro Corvaja Italy
Samir Siksek United Kingdom
David Masser Switzerland
Paul Monsky United States
Yuri Bilu France
Peter Shiu United Kingdom
Jonathan Pila relative to Marc Hindry France Marc Hindry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Marc Hindry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pila

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pila's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pila more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pila

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pila. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pila. The network helps show where Jonathan Pila may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Pila, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Pila Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Pila links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989173
2 2006105
3 199095
4 201176
5 200852
6 200446
7 199328
8 200927
9 199126
10 201420
11 201620
12 201219
13 201118
14 201017
15 200817
16 200516
17 200216
18 200614
19 201914
20 201314

About Jonathan Pila

Jonathan Pila is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (20 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (9 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (9 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (9 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (8 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (720 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (238 citations), Mathematical Physics (412 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (43 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (107 citations). Jonathan Pila has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Enrico Bombieri, Alex J. Wilkie, Jacob Tsimerman, Umberto M. Zannier, Hendrik W. Lenstra, Carl B. Pomerance, Daniel J. Bernstein, Ngaiming Mok, Fernando Rodríguez Villegas and Raf Cluckers. Their work appears in journals such as Duke Mathematical Journal, Annals of Mathematics, Compositio Mathematica, Annales de l’institut Fourier and The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact