Michael Stoll

65 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

Michael Stoll
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Geometry and Topology 701
  • Algebra and Number Theory 225
  • Mathematical Physics 340
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 101
  • Theoretical Computer Science 23
Replace Lajos Hajdu with:
Lajos Hajdu Hungary
Jacques Martinet France
Gerhard Frey Germany
Nigel Boston United States
Hugh C. Williams Canada
Daqing Wan United States
J. H. E. Cohn United Kingdom
Wojciech A. Trybulec
Arnaldo Garcia Brazil
Reinie Erné France
Michael Stoll relative to Lajos Hajdu Hungary Lajos Hajdu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lajos Hajdu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stoll. The network helps show where Michael Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stoll Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stoll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199983
2 200169
3 200346
4 200745
5 200936
6 200834
7 200232
8 200130
9 199230
10 200827
11
Independence of rational points on twists of a given curve
201223
12 200823
13 201023
14 200822
15 199622
16 201422
17 199921
18 201318
19 200213
20 200213

About Michael Stoll

Michael Stoll is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 75 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (46 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (18 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (17 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (12 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (10 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (9 papers) and Advanced Image Processing Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (701 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (225 citations), Mathematical Physics (340 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (101 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (23 citations). Michael Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bjorn Poonen, Nils Bruin, Edward F. Schaefer, J. E. Cremona, Andrés Bruhn, Tom Fisher, Samir Siksek, Maurice Mignotte, William Stein and Yann Bugeaud. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), Acta Arithmetica, Algebra & Number Theory and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact