David Goss

1.4k citations
31 papers · 810 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Goss

30 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

David Goss
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Algebra and Number Theory 356
  • Geometry and Topology 559
  • Mathematical Physics 372
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 93
  • Theoretical Computer Science 20
Replace Michael Rosen with:
Michael Rosen United States
Alexei N. Skorobogatov United Kingdom
Jonathan Pila United Kingdom
Marc Hindry France
Ralph Greenberg United States
Leonard Lipshitz United States
Ciro Ciliberto Italy
J. S. Milne United States
José Felipe Voloch United States
Jürgen Neukirch Germany
David Goss relative to Michael Rosen United States Michael Rosen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael Rosen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Goss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Goss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Goss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Goss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Goss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Goss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Goss. The network helps show where David Goss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Goss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Goss Line = papers co-authored together David Goss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996362
2
$\pi$-adic Eisenstein series for function fields
198058
3
The arithmetic of function fields
198153
4 198046
5 197934
6 198934
7 197827
8 198326
9 200324
10 198318
11 198514
12 198214
13 198812
14 198011
15 20009
16 20049
17 20137
18 20147
19 19827
20 20206

About David Goss

David Goss is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (15 papers), advanced mathematical theories (11 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (8 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (5 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (4 papers) and Advanced Topology and Set Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (356 citations), Geometry and Topology (559 citations), Mathematical Physics (372 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (93 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations). David Goss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W. Sinnott, Gebhard Böckle, Urs Hartl, Matthew A. Papanikolas, Douglas Ulmer, David Burns and Dinesh S. Thakur. Their work appears in journals such as Duke Mathematical Journal, Journal of Number Theory, Mathematische Annalen, Inventiones mathematicae and Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact