Annales de l’institut Fourier

3.2k papers and 50.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier in the last decades have received a total of 50.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.9k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.8k papers) and Applied Mathematics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (833 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (581 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (422 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annales de l’institut Fourier are Gustave Choquet, Vladimir I. Arnold, Adrian Constantin, Haïm Brézis, Zhongwei Shen, Jean-Michel Bony, Laurent Schwartz, Bernard Malgrange, Jean-Pierre Serre and Laure Cardoulis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier.

Countries where authors publish in Annales de l’institut Fourier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annales de l’institut Fourier. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annales de l’institut Fourier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annales de l’institut Fourier more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025