Jon Nash

893 citations
18 papers · 654 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Nash

18 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Jon Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 347
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 209
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 69
Replace Gloria Arankowsky‐Sandoval with:
Gloria Arankowsky‐Sandoval Mexico
Elisa Favaron United Kingdom
Nicholas DeMartinis United States
Horst Gann Germany
A. Pringle United Kingdom
S. Argyropoulos United Kingdom
Mary-Jane Attenburrow United Kingdom
Bruno Ribeiro Do Couto Spain
DJ NUTT United Kingdom
Christopher Gross United States
Jon Nash relative to Gloria Arankowsky‐Sandoval Mexico Gloria Arankowsky‐Sandoval's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gloria Arankowsky‐Sandoval · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Nash. The network helps show where Jon Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Nash Line = papers co-authored together Jon Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2008131
2 200397
3 200392
4 200469
5 200267
6 200262
7 200726
8 200525
9 200524
10 200718
11 200413
12 20097
13 20077
14 20046
15 20084
16 20173
17 20002
18 20041

About Jon Nash

Jon Nash is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (347 citations), Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (69 citations). Jon Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David Nutt, Spilios V. Argyropoulos, Ann Rich, Caroline Bell, Sean Hood, Susan J. Wilson, Jane Hicks, John Potokar, Carolyn Brice and Andrew Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychopharmacology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Alcohol and Alcoholism, Biological Psychiatry and Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact