Jane Hicks

431 citations
12 papers · 312 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Hicks

12 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Jane Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Occupational Therapy 16
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 51
Replace Sonia Ancoli-Israel with:
Sonia Ancoli-Israel United States
Mei Ling Song South Korea
Simon A. Rego United States
Andreas Jaehne Germany
Jessica L. Graves United States
Fatanah Ramlee Malaysia
Sylvie Royant‐Parola France
Leigh McGraw United States
Tobias Wiklund Sweden
Mustafa Solmaz Türkiye
Jane Hicks relative to Sonia Ancoli-Israel United States Sonia Ancoli-Israel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Sonia Ancoli-Israel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Hicks. The network helps show where Jane Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Jane Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200397
2 200262
3 200436
4 198832
5 200824
6 200016
7 200915
8 200512
9
Pseudo-narcolepsy: case report.
19997
10 19895
11 20224
12 20102

About Jane Hicks

Jane Hicks is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 12 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Music Therapy and Health (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations), Occupational Therapy (16 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (51 citations). Jane Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Nutt, Spilios V. Argyropoulos, Caroline Bell, Jon Nash, Susan J. Wilson, Ann Rich, Sue Wilson, J. G. Jenkins, Andrew Green and Christopher Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Journal of Sleep Research, European Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact