Jon Bartrip

438 citations
9 papers · 344 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Bartrip

9 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Jon Bartrip
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 132
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 36
Replace Mark VanDam with:
Mark VanDam United States
Nicholas W. Bankson United States
Linda J. Ferrier United States
Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner Brazil
Оlga Frolova Russia
Susannah Hall United States
Jei-Tun Wu Taiwan
K. Semir Tatlidil United Kingdom
John E. Bernthal United States
Kim A. Wilcox United States
Jon Bartrip relative to Mark VanDam United States Mark VanDam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mark VanDam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Bartrip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Bartrip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Bartrip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Bartrip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Bartrip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Bartrip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Bartrip. The network helps show where Jon Bartrip may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jon Bartrip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Bartrip Line = papers co-authored together Jon Bartrip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200979
2 198873
3 200164
4 199233
5 200926
6 200926
7 198823
8 199316
9
Effectiveness of frequency shifted feedback at reducing disfluency for linguistically easy, and difficult, sections of speech (original audio recordings included).
20044

About Jon Bartrip

Jon Bartrip is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Linguistics and Language, having authored 9 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Children's Physical and Motor Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (132 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (36 citations). Jon Bartrip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Peter Howell, Stephen R. Davis, John Morton, Judith I. Laszlo, Phillip J. Bairstow, Scania de Schonen, Ursula Rolfe, Suzanne Dziurawiec, Mark H. Johnson and Andrew Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Discourse Processes, Infant Behavior and Development and Support for Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact