Mark VanDam

956 citations
47 papers · 633 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark VanDam

44 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Mark VanDam
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 379
  • Pharmacy 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Developmental Biology 16
Replace David J. Ertmer with:
David J. Ertmer United States
Sophie E. Ambrose United States
Michele L. Steffens United States
Osnat Segal Israel
Rory A. DePaolis United States
Tonya R. Bergeson United States
Marie‐Thérèse Le Normand France
David Snow United States
Rachael Frush Holt United States
Nan Xu Rattanasone Australia
Mark VanDam relative to David J. Ertmer United States David J. Ertmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
David J. Ertmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark VanDam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark VanDam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark VanDam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark VanDam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark VanDam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark VanDam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark VanDam. The network helps show where Mark VanDam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark VanDam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark VanDam Line = papers co-authored together Mark VanDam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014111
2 2012107
3 2016103
4 201631
5 201529
6 201723
7 201921
8 202218
9 202017
10 201717
11 201414
12 202111
13 20189
14 20208
15 20158
16 20228
17 20218
18 20237
19 20117
20 20197

About Mark VanDam

Mark VanDam is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Signal Processing, having authored 47 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (18 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (379 citations), Pharmacy (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations) and Developmental Biology (16 citations). Mark VanDam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mary Pat Moeller, Sophie E. Ambrose, Noah H. Silbert, Elika Bergelson, Anne S. Warlaumont, Alejandrina Cristià, Mélanie Söderström, Brian MacWhinney, Nancy L. Potter and Stephen James. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Ear and Hearing, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact