Countries where authors publish in Sport Management Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sport Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sport Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sport Management Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sport Management Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sport Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sport Management Review.
About Sport Management Review
The 895 papers published in Sport Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 34.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Sport Management Review usually cover Gender Studies (533 papers), Sociology and Political Science (681 papers), Marketing (125 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (44 papers) and Applied Psychology (42 papers) specifically the topics of Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (548 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (522 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (192 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (138 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (105 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (69 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (64 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sport Management Review are Daniel C. Funk, Heather Gibson, Pamela Wicker, Nico Schulenkorf, David Shilbury, Alison Doherty, Janet Fink, Laura Burton, George B. Cunningham and Bob Heere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.