John Innes

102 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John Innes
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Management Information Systems 843
  • Applied Psychology 218
  • Accounting 537
  • Social Psychology 663
  • Public Administration 101
Replace Frank A. Bosco with:
Frank A. Bosco United States
Peter Herriot United Kingdom
John Hunter New Zealand
Robert Rosenthal United States
Joan F. Brett United States
Yochi Cohen‐Charash United States
Robert P. Quinn United States
Norman R. F. Maier United States
Eugene Webb United States
Gerald S. Leventhal United States
John Innes relative to Frank A. Bosco United States Frank A. Bosco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Frank A. Bosco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Innes. The network helps show where John Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Innes Line = papers co-authored together John Innes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Recent advances in social psychology : an international perspective
1989377
2 2000270
3 1995238
4 1990158
5 1995137
6 1988116
7 199499
8
Social facilitation: Author index
199369
9
Social facilitation: Experimental studies of social facilitation
199369
10 198261
11 199161
12 200151
13 199048
14 198947
15 199744
16 197541
17 200937
18 200536
19 198236
20 199329

About John Innes

John Innes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Accounting, Management Information Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (13 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (843 citations), Applied Psychology (218 citations), Accounting (537 citations), Social Psychology (663 citations) and Public Administration (101 citations). John Innes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Falconer Mitchell, Joseph P. Forgas, Bernard Guérin, Donald Sinclair, Martha Augoustinos, Christine Helliar, David Hatherly, Reza Kouhy, Simon Kitto and Guy Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Management Accounting Research, European Journal of Social Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and British Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact