John Frederick

599 citations
32 papers · 396 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Frederick

27 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

John Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Clinical Psychology 231
  • Safety Research 73
  • Health 59
  • Public Administration 18
  • General Health Professions 105
Replace Jill D. McLeigh with:
Jill D. McLeigh United States
Rose Greene United States
Joanne Filippelli Canada
Megan McGraw Letson United States
Eric Hadley-Ives United States
Helga Hanks United Kingdom
Aislinn Conrad United States
Ying-Ying T. Yuan United States
Stephanie Taplin Australia
Carmela J. DeCandia United States
John Frederick relative to Jill D. McLeigh United States Jill D. McLeigh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Jill D. McLeigh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick. The network helps show where John Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside John Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Frederick Line = papers co-authored together John Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201493
2 201552
3 200735
4 201933
5 200826
6 201922
7 201021
8 200818
9 202313
10 201011
11 202010
12 20069
13
Legislation and child death review processes in Australia: Understanding our failure to prevent child death
20108
14 20128
15 20208
16 20225
17 20245
18 20194
19 20223
20
Child death in high-income countries 1 Learning from child death review in the USA, England, Australia, and New Zealand
20142

About John Frederick

John Frederick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (17 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (231 citations), Safety Research (73 citations), Health (59 citations), Public Administration (18 citations) and General Health Professions (105 citations). John Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Chris Goddard, John Devaney, Trevor Spratt, Eva Alisic, Peter D. Sidebotham, Edwin A. Mitchell, James I. Fraser, Revathi Nuggehalli Krishna, Jennifer Anne Oxley and Rebecca A Newton. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Child & Family Social Work, Child Abuse Review, Journal of Family Violence and Youth Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact