John Frederick

572 citations
30 papers · 379 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Frederick

27 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

John Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Clinical Psychology 224
  • Safety Research 75
  • Health 57
  • Public Administration 19
  • General Health Professions 102
Replace Joanne Filippelli with:
Joanne Filippelli Canada
Eric Hadley-Ives United States
Miriam Maclean Australia
Helga Hanks United Kingdom
Monica Feit South Africa
Aislinn Conrad United States
Ying-Ying T. Yuan United States
Stephanie Taplin Australia
Josianne Lamothe Canada
Carmela J. DeCandia United States
John Frederick relative to Joanne Filippelli Canada Joanne Filippelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Joanne Filippelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick. The network helps show where John Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Frederick Line = papers co-authored together John Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201485
2 201549
3 200734
4 201932
5 200825
6 201021
7 201920
8 200819
9 202311
10 200611
11 201011
12 20209
13 20129
14
Legislation and child death review processes in Australia: Understanding our failure to prevent child death
20108
15 20207
16 20225
17 20244
18 20193
19 20223
20 20092

About John Frederick

John Frederick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Safety Research and Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (11 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (224 citations), Safety Research (75 citations), Health (57 citations), Public Administration (19 citations) and General Health Professions (102 citations). John Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Chris Goddard, John Devaney, Eva Alisic, Trevor Spratt, James Fraser, Peter Sidebotham, Edwin A. Mitchell, Revathi N. Krishna, Jennifer Oxley and Mark Dibben. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Child Abuse Review, Child & Family Social Work, Youth Justice and International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact