James Fraser

1.6k citations
45 papers · 832 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

James Fraser

44 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

James Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 58
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 175
  • General Health Professions 123
  • Nephrology 33
  • Emergency Medicine 38
Replace Fatemeh Bahramnezhad with:
Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Iran
Mansoureh Zagheri Tafreshi Iran
Mark Pfeifer United States
Ann Thompson United States
Fernanda Carneiro Mussi Brazil
Vibeke Zoffmann Denmark
Lauri A. Linder United States
Shin‐Jeong Kim South Korea
John Parboosingh Canada
Lisa Day United States
James Fraser relative to Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Iran Fatemeh Bahramnezhad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Fatemeh Bahramnezhad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Fraser. The network helps show where James Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Fraser Line = papers co-authored together James Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201480
2 201375
3 201474
4 201051
5 201949
6 201447
7 199843
8 200440
9 200439
10 201138
11 201331
12 201928
13 199726
14 201923
15 201722
16 202118
17 201818
18 201416
19 197014
20 201513

About James Fraser

James Fraser is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (58 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (175 citations), General Health Professions (123 citations), Nephrology (33 citations) and Emergency Medicine (38 citations). James Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Bryce, Peter Sidebotham, Quen Mok, Robert C. Tasker, John Frederick, Edwin A. Mitchell, Stavros Petrou, Simon Lenton, Fiona Finlay and Martin Ward Platt. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Disease in Childhood, The Lancet, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Child Abuse Review and European Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact