Monica Feit
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Safety Research top 5%
- Child Welfare and Adoption
Papers in
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
-
- Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Joshua J. Joseph (7 shared papers)Anne C. Petersen (6 shared papers)Angela Mathee (2 shared papers)Brendon Barnes (2 shared papers)Youth Board on Children (6 shared papers)Sophie Plagerson (1 shared paper)Shan Naidoo (1 shared paper)Nisha Naicker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology (1 paper)Health Education Research (1 paper)National Academies Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Monica Feit
8 papers receiving 312 citations
Monica Feit's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Clinical Psychology 228
- Safety Research 77
- Health 52
- General Health Professions 102
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 27
Countries citing papers authored by Monica Feit
This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Feit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Feit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Feit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Feit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Feit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Feit. The network helps show where Monica Feit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Monica Feit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 283 |
| 2 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 3 | Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect | 2014 | 7 |
| 4 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 5 | COMMITTEE ON CHILD MALTREATMENT RESEARCH, POLICY, AND PRACTICE FOR THE NEXT DECADE: PHASE II | 2014 | 4 |
| 6 | Describing the Problem | 2014 | 4 |
| 7 | Child Abuse and Neglect Policy | 2014 | 2 |
| 8 | The Child Welfare System | 2014 | 2 |
| 9 | Interventions and Service Delivery Systems | 2014 | 1 |
About Monica Feit
Monica Feit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper), Noise Effects and Management (1 paper), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper) and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (228 citations), Safety Research (77 citations), Health (52 citations), General Health Professions (102 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (27 citations). Monica Feit has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joshua J. Joseph, Anne C. Petersen, Angela Mathee, Brendon Barnes, Youth Board on Children, Sophie Plagerson, Shan Naidoo, Nisha Naicker, Trudy Harpham and Anne C. Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Health Education Research and National Academies Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.