Countries where authors publish in Journal of Social Work
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Social Work more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Social Work
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Social Work.
About Journal of Social Work
The 897 papers published in Journal of Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Social Work usually cover Public Administration (422 papers), General Health Professions (453 papers), Clinical Psychology (300 papers), Safety Research (83 papers) and Health (64 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (420 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (219 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (149 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (91 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (86 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (66 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (63 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Social Work are Ransford Danso, James Midgley, Jerry Tew, Paul Michael Garrett, Carolina Överlien, Carolyn Noble, Jüha Hämäläinen, Malcolm Payne, Gila M. Acker and Stan Houston.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.