John Biggs
Impact in
- Education top 0.01%
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Online and Blended Learning
- Reflective Practices in Education
- Student Assessment and Feedback
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Papers in
- Education 41
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices 21
- Student Assessment and Feedback 12
- Reflective Practices in Education 8
- Online and Blended Learning 7
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 5
- Higher Education Learning Practices 4
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 10
- Educational and Psychological Assessments 9
- Co-authors
- Catherine So–kum Tang (5 shared papers)David Watkins (5 shared papers)David Kember (2 shared papers)Doris Y. P. Leung (2 shared papers)Nola Purdie (2 shared papers)John Hattie (2 shared papers)Phillip J. Moore (1 shared paper)John R. Kirby (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Educational Psychology (9 papers)Australian Journal of Education (6 papers)Higher Education Research & Development (5 papers)Higher Education (3 papers)Educational Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaHong KongUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Biggs
79 papers receiving 18.0k citations
John Biggs's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- Education 15.9k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 4.7k
- Computer Science Applications 1.7k
- Media Technology 1.8k
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 334
Countries citing papers authored by John Biggs
This map shows the geographic impact of John Biggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Biggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Biggs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Biggs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Biggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Biggs. The network helps show where John Biggs may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Biggs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teaching For Quality Learning At University Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 4746 |
| 2 | Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 2220 |
| 3 | Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 2170 |
| 4 | The revised two‐factor Study Process Questionnaire: R‐SPQ‐2F Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 1509 |
| 5 | Student Approaches to Learning and Studying Hit paper breakdown → | 1987 | 1486 |
| 6 | The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences. Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 1047 |
| 7 | What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 846 |
| 8 | Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 790 |
| 9 | What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 731 |
| 10 | Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes Hit paper breakdown → | 1979 | 572 |
| 11 | Approaches to the Enhancement of Tertiary Teaching Hit paper breakdown → | 1989 | 505 |
| 12 | 1993 | 445 | |
| 13 | Calidad del aprendizaje universitario Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 427 |
| 14 | What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 410 |
| 15 | THE ROLE OF METALEARNING IN STUDY PROCESSES Hit paper breakdown → | 1985 | 393 |
| 16 | The process of learning | 1993 | 337 |
| 17 | INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES Hit paper breakdown → | 1978 | 328 |
| 18 | 2001 | 298 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 233 | |
| 20 | Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives | 2001 | 215 |
About John Biggs
John Biggs is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Media Technology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 21.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (21 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (12 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (9 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (15.9k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (4.7k citations), Computer Science Applications (1.7k citations), Media Technology (1.8k citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (334 citations). John Biggs has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine So–kum Tang, David Watkins, David Kember, Doris Y. P. Leung, Nola Purdie, John Hattie, Phillip J. Moore, John R. Kirby, Kevin F. Collis and Farideh Salili. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Psychology, Australian Journal of Education, Higher Education Research & Development, Higher Education and Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.